Site icon Geo Punjab

SC Upholds Punjab & Haryana High Court’s Decision on Wrestling Federation Elections

<p> <br &sol;>&NewLine;<br &sol;>&NewLine; &Tab; Wrestling Federation of India <&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&Tab; Andhra Pradesh Amateur Wrestling Association was asked to approach the High Court with their Grievances&Tab; &Tab;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;NEW-DELHI&colon; In a recent development&comma; the Supreme Court of India has declined to intervene in the decision taken by the Punjab and Haryana High Court to suspend the elections of the Wrestling Federation of India &lpar;WFI&rpar;&period; The decision came in response to a petition filed by the Andhra Pradesh Amateur Wrestling Association&comma; which had sought the Supreme Court&&num;8217&semi;s intervention against the High Court&&num;8217&semi;s ruling&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>A distinguished bench comprising Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Pankaj Mittal emphasized that the petitioner should direct their concerns to the Punjab and Haryana High Court&comma; which had issued the stay order on the WFI elections&period; The bench asserted that the appropriate course of action for the petitioner was to address their grievances at the High Court level rather than filing a special leave petition at the Supreme Court&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&&num;8220&semi;Why should we hear it&quest; You go to the High Court&&num;8230&semi; Instead of filing an application to vacate the interim stay&comma; the petitioner decided to approach the Supreme Court&period; We&comma; therefore&comma; decline to entertain this special leave petition&comma;&&num;8221&semi; the bench articulated during the hearing&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Notably&comma; The wrestling community had been awaiting a decision on the matter following the Andhra Pradesh Amateur Wrestling Association&&num;8217&semi;s appeal against the High Court&&num;8217&semi;s August 11 order to halt the elections&period; The apex court&&num;8217&semi;s ruling to defer to the High Court&&num;8217&semi;s jurisdiction reaffirms the established legal principle of allowing lower courts to address matters within their purview&period;<br &sol;>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab; end-of <&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;

Exit mobile version