Site icon Geo Punjab

Imran Khan’s Judicial Custody Extended for 14 Days in Official Secrets Act Case

<p> <br &sol;>&NewLine;<br &sol;>&NewLine; &Tab; Imran Khan<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&Tab; Former PM Imran Khan was apprehended in March of the previous year on charges related to violating the Official Secrets Act&Tab; &Tab;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;ISLAMABAD&colon; A Special court in Pakistan extended the judicial custody of former Prime Minister Imran Khan for an additional 14 days in the Official Secrets Act case&period; This decision diminishes the likelihood of his early release&period; Imran Khan&comma; the Chief of Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf &lpar;PTI&rpar; party&comma; was apprehended in March of the previous year on charges related to violating the Official Secrets Act&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>The Accusations stem from the alleged breach of confidentiality concerning an official document &lpar;cipher&rpar; transmitted by the Pakistani embassy in the United States&period; This marks the third time Khan&&num;8217&semi;s judicial custody has been prolonged&comma; with the last 14-day detention period ending on the day of this recent extension&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>Conducted by Special Court Judge Abul Hasnat Zulqarnain at District Jail Attock&comma; the hearing led to the decision to extend Imran Khan&&num;8217&semi;s judicial custody until October 10&comma; allowing ample time to conclude the ongoing investigation&period; Imran Khan has been detained at this jail since August 5&comma; subsequent to being declared guilty in the Toshakhana case&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>In a parallel development&comma; the court also prolonged the custody of former Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi for the same duration&comma; implicating him under the Official Secrets Act as well&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;<p>However&comma; despite a recent order by the Islamabad High Court to transfer Imran Khan to Rawalpindi&&num;8217&semi;s Adiala Jail&comma; no action has been taken yet&period; The authorities had previously justified hearing the case within the jail premises citing security concerns&period; <br &sol;>&NewLine;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab;&Tab; end-of <&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;

Exit mobile version