Site icon Geo Punjab

Committee for Reformsin Criminal Laws and its Processes

Committee for Reformsin Criminal Laws and its Processes

&NewLine;<p>The Committee for Reforms in Criminal Laws was constituted by MHA in March 2020 with an aim of examining and suggesting necessary reforms in the Indian Penal Code&comma; 1860&semi; Code of Criminal Procedure&comma; 1973&comma; and the Indian Evidence Act&comma; 1872&period; The Committee had an initial timeframe of six months’ term&period; This was extended by 14 months and the Committee submitted its report to Hon’ble Union Home Minister on February 27&comma; 2022&period;<&sol;p>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<ol start&equals;"2" class&equals;"wp-block-list">&NewLine;<li>This Committee was headed by Prof&period; Srikrishna Deva Rao&comma; Vice Chancellor&comma; National Law University&comma; Delhi&period; The other members of the Committee were&colon; Prof&period; &lpar;Dr&period;&rpar; G&period;S&period; Bajpai&comma; Vice Chancellor&comma; RGNUL Patiala&semi; Shri Mahesh Jethmalani&comma; Senior Advocate and Member of Parliament&comma; Rajya Sabha&semi; Prof&period; &lpar;Dr&period;&rpar; Balraj Chauhan&comma; Former Vice Chancellor&comma; DNLU&comma; Jabalpur&semi; Shri G&period;P&period; Thareja&comma; Former District &amp&semi; Sessions Judge&comma; Delhi&semi; Shri Praveen Sinha&comma; IPS&comma; Special Director&comma; CBI and Dr&period; Padmini Singh&comma; Additional Legal Advisor&comma; CBI&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The Committee had a broad mandate to reform criminal laws&comma; with focus on the Indian Penal Code&comma; 1860&comma; the Code of Criminal Procedure&comma; 1973 and the Indian Evidence Act&comma; 1872&period; At the outset&comma; the Committee identified the following guiding considerations that have informed its approach to the reform process&colon;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;a&rpar; Primacy of the Constitution<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;b&rpar; Primacy of Human Rights<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;c&rpar; Revisiting the Relationship<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>Between the State and the Individual<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;d&rpar; Victim Justice<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;e&rpar; Safeguarding the rights of the Accused<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;f &rpar; Fair and Time-bound Investigation<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;g&rpar; Fair and Time-bound Trial<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;h&rpar; Simplified&comma; unambiguous and consistent Procedure<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;i&rpar; Transparency and Accountability<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>&lpar;j&rpar; Infusing Techno-centricity<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The Committee had a challenging task in its hands and had to grapple with the COVID pandemic which forced many consultations on the virtual mode&period; During these consultations&comma; suggestions were received from a variety of stakeholders including judges&comma; advocates&comma; academic institutions&comma; non-government organisations&comma; law enforcement agencies including Police&comma; Para-military forces&comma; research institutions and citizens&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>Suggestions were sought from all Governors&comma; Chief Ministers&comma; Lt&period; Governors&sol;Administrators of States&sol; Union Territories&comma; Chief Justice of India&comma; Chief Justices of all High Courts&comma; Bar Councils and Law Universities&sol; Institutions&period; Hon’ble Members of Parliament &lpar;both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha&rpar; were also requested to give their suggestions in this regard&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The suggestions received from Supreme Court of India&comma; 16 High Courts&comma; 42 Members of Parliament&comma; 18 States&comma; 6 Union Territories&comma; 22 Law Universities and 5 judicial academies were also forwarded to the Committee&period; Suggestions were also received from more than 1000 Police officers from different States&sol;UTs&comma; Central Police Organisations&comma; Central Bureau of Investigation &lpar;CBI&rpar;&comma; Intelligence Bureau &lpar;IB&rpar; and Bureau of Police Research &amp&semi; Development &lpar;BPR&amp&semi;D&rpar;&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The Committee after extensive consultations with all stakeholders and meticulous research&comma; submitted its recommendations to the Ministry of Home Affairs&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The Ministry of Home Affairs considered the recommendations of the Committee along-with suggestions received from various stakeholders&period; After extensive and detailed examination of these recommendations&sol;suggestions&comma; three Bills were prepared to repeal the Indian Penal Code 1860&comma; the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and the Indian Evidence Act 1872&comma; and replace them with Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023&comma; Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023&comma; respectively&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>The Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023&comma; Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023 and Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023 are inter-dependent and work in tandem to fulfil the aspirations of robust and responsive Criminal Justice System&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;&NewLine;<li>These new Criminal Acts addresses the current challenges faced in the Criminal Justice System and also introduces provisions to incorporate Technology and Forensic Science&comma; simplify procedures&comma; reduce pendency of cases in Courts&comma; strengthen Prosecution&comma; increase Fines upon Conviction&comma; decrease crowding in Correctional Homes&comma; besides expediting and simplifying the process of Trial&period;<&sol;li>&NewLine;<&sol;ol>&NewLine;

Exit mobile version